|
home > resources > archive
ACLU of Utah Activist Email Newsletter: February
2004
In this issue:
Utah and the MATRIX
ACLU of Utah and the 2004 Legislature
Resolutions passed to oppose the PATRIOT Act
March for Women’s Lives, April 25, 2004, Washington,
DC
Support the SAFE Act
Chasing Freedom
Utah
and the MATRIX
MATRIX is the latest data-mining program to emerge from the government.
This surveillance system combines information about individuals from
government databases and private-sector data companies. It then makes
those dossiers available for search by government officials and combs
through the millions of files in a search for anomalies that may be
indicative of terrorist or other criminal activity.
The ACLU of Utah commends Governor Olene Walker’s decision on Thursday,
January 29, to suspend Utah’s participation in the MATRIX (Multistate
Anti- Terrorism Information Exchange) program pending review and evaluation
by an oversight committee including state legislators. Governor Walker
cited protection of personal privacy concerns in her decision to impose
a stay on Utah’s participation in the project. The ACLU is also heartened
by an immediate introduction of a house resolution and bill to halt
Utah’s involvement in the MATRIX.
"Utah conservatives echoed ACLU s concerns about the MATRIX program
and similar security measures in post-9/11 America," said Stephanie
Peterson, Safe and Free advocate for the ACLU of Utah. "Sections
of the USA PATRIOT Act raise many of the same concerns among privacy
advocates. Both programs make personal and financial information easily
available for use by law enforcement that go beyond combating terrorism.
They are based on the flawed and dangerous intelligence idea that to
catch terrorists, the government needs to spy on people who have done
nothing wrong."
The MATRIX system is a federally funded database that would combine
over 20 billion records on individuals from government and private sources.
It is still in the developmental stage and out of the original 16 states
originally interested in the program, only six remain and several of
those are wavering.
On November 18, 2003, the ACLU of Utah sent a formal request pursuant
to the Utah Government Records and Management Act (GRAMA), to allow
inspection of the public records held by the Utah Department of Public
Safety (UDPS) regarding MATRIX. We have still not received the information,
but officials with UDPS have said that they will respond shortly. Despite
the Governor’s suspension of Utah’s involvement in the program, this
information will help us understand important aspects and implications
of this federal program.
To see more information about MATRIX, please visit
our web page.
ACLU of Utah
and the 2004 Legislature
While we do not have the resources to keep a full time lobbyist on the
hill, we devote a portion of our staff time and energy toward legislative
activities and have organized a group of dedicated volunteers to be
citizen lobbyists who will help us track and take an action on important
bills.
The list of bills we track will change almost daily, but our current
draft of important legislation includes issues such as:Reproductive
Rights; Marriage; Education; Prison; Death Penalty; Privacy; Open Government;
and the Bill of Rights.
To see the full list of
bills, please visit our page.
We have taken action on several bills being considered. Most recently,
on Monday, February 9, the ACLU of Utah submitted a letter to members
of the House Judiciary Committee in support of "HJR 10, Joint Resolution
Reaffirming the State of Utah’s Commitment to the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights." The letter was signed by a coalition of grassroots
organizations representing a wide range of political perspectives. The
letter reads in part, " Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are
the foundation for our freedoms, and we can all agree on the importance
of protecting them even during a time of crisis..... Some of the actions
that prompt our concern are portions of the USA PATRIOT Act, the no
fly lists for airlines, the MATRIX personal data collection experiment,
the scrutiny of peaceful protesters, the broadened definition of domestic
terrorism, the use of the USA PATRIOT Act for non-terrorism cases, and
access by law enforcement to detailed personal information through third
parties. A check on law enforcement authority, specifically in the areas
of surveillance and detention, is an important principle, even in times
of uncertainty."
Also, during the initial debate on "SB 69 - Partial Birth Abortion Amendments,"
Margaret Plane, staff attorney for the ACLU of Utah, testified before
the Senate Judiciary Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee
on January 20, concerning the unconstitutionality of the proposed legislation.
We delivered a letter to the committee members outlining our concerns.
The letter read in part, "The ACLU of Utah implores the committee
to vote against Senate Bill 69 because it is constitutionally defective
and therefore subject to legal challenge. S.B. 69, which is nearly identical
to federal legislation struck down in Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S.91
(2000), is unconstitutional on two grounds: it fails to include an exception
for the health of the pregnant woman and it is too broad."
Our ACLU affiliate joined with a large coalition of community leaders
to testify before the Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal
Justice Committee, against the proposed "S.B. 24 Marriage Defined,"
on January 21 . Margaret Plane argued that the bill, which would declare
that Utah could only recognize marriage between a man and a woman, was
unconstitutional. This bill has been passed by the House and is now
before the full Senate and could come up for a vote at any time.
To see all of the bills we are tracking please
visit our web page.
Resolutions passed
to oppose the PATRIOT Act
Resolutions have been passed in 253 communities in 37 states including
three state-wide resolutions. These communities represent approximately
43.5 million people who oppose sections of the USA PATRIOT Act.
To
see the complete list of resolutions, please visit our page.
March for Women’s
Lives, April 25, 2004, Washington, DC
The time is right for a public demonstration of historic size in support
of abortion rights and reproductive freedom for all women. Our rights
are under attack as they haven”t been in over a decade, and Roe v. Wade
hangs by a thread in the Supreme Court. You can help build the momentum
we need to preserve our rights. Please join us to March for Women’s
Lives.
In recent years, the federal government has been actively stripping
away women’s reproductive rights. Congress passed and President Bush
signed the first piece of federal legislation to criminalize safe abortion
procedures, allowing no exception for a woman’s health. This Administration
continues to approve a global gag rule that bans U.S. aid to international
groups that use their own money to support abortion and could help prevent
pregnancy related deaths world-wide. In addition, the Administration
has restricted federal funding for responsible family planning (in favor
of unrealistic abstinence only programs) that could reduce the need
for abortions in this country. In fact, the President proposed doubling
funding for these flawed abstinence only programs.
The retirement of just one U.S. Supreme Court Justice will enable the
President and Congressional leadership to select an anti-Choice judge,
who would tilt the 5-4 majority against current protections. If the
Supreme Court majority shifts, as many as 17 states would likely reverse
women’s constitutional right to privacy. We will go back to the sad
days of more unwanted children and dangerous illegal abortions, days
when women were not empowered to be fully contributing partners in society.
That is why hundreds of thousands of men and women will participate
in the March for Women’s Lives in Washington D.C. on April 25, and why
we are preparing Americans in all fifty states and the District of Columbia
to make their voices heard in the months ahead. The way to keep the
state of the union strong is to protect all Americans rights to privacy
not to increase the heavy hand of government intrusion.
For more information about the March and to register as part of the
Utah contingent, please visit our
web page.
Support the SAFE Act
Despite an unprecedented public relations offensive by Attorney General
Ashcroft and a veto threat from the White House, Congress is moving
toward revising the Patriot Act’s most dangerous provisions.
Buoyed by the ground swell of opposition -- more than 245 communities
and 3 states have passed resolutions in opposition to the PATRIOT Act
-- momentum is building for legislation that would correct PATRIOT Act
provisions that allow for unwarranted investigations of personal records,
authorize secret sneak and peek searches and roll back judicial oversight.
This corrective legislation -- the SAFE Act -- would not repeal commonsense
provisions in the PATRIOT Act, but would instead revise those provisions
that infringe on our civil liberties without making us any safer. Yet
even this modest bill drew the wrath of Attorney General Ashcroft who
falsely said that it would, make it even more difficult to mount an
effective anti-terror campaign than it was before the Patriot Act was
passed."
Take Action! Tell your Members of Congress to cosponsor the SAFE Act
so we can be both safe and free.
Click
here for more information and to send a free fax to your Members of
Congress.
Chasing Freedom
Monday Feb 16th Jim Santy Auditorium, Park City Library 7:30 pm screening
CHASING FREEDOM, Q&A to follow. For more information call Geralyn
Dreyfous at 801-560-8224
Michael Posner and Arthur Helton (who recently died in the Embassy Bombing
in Iraq) started The Lawyers Committee For Human Rights in New York.
Once an office of a few lawyers cajoling others to take on cases law
school never prepared them for, the Lawyers Committee has grown to include
psychiatrists, doctors, and criminal justice advocates and has recently
morphed into HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST, a full scale human rights legal and
advocacy organization. Michael has spent much of his life defending
people who have come to this country seeking political asylum and has
recently along with others, authored a report called IN LIBERTY’s SHADOW
that reviews asylum law under post 9-11 and Patriots Act mandates. Their
work on an asylum case involving a young Afghani girl has recently been
made into a movie called CHASING FREEDOM.
"Chasing Freedom," tells the story of a young Afghan woman
(played by Lela Alizada) who is persecuted by the Taliban for running
a school for young girls and the pro bono attorney (played by Juliette
Lewis) who reluctantly takes on her asylum case after the woman is detained
when she arrives at a U.S. airport in search of refuge. The film was
inspired by a real asylum case handled by a team of dedicated pro bono
attorneys from Debevoise and Plimpton and The Lawyers Committee for
Human Rights. It is a sobering depiction of the nearly insurmountable
obstacles that asylum seekers face when they arrive in the U.S.
This film and discussion is must see for anyone working with refugee
communities, immigration law and ordinary Americans trying to make sense
of the World Trade Center bombing and our subsequent response with the
Patriots Act and Homeland Security. It has been screened with great
acclaim for the Homeland Security staff and at the detention center
where the protagonist, Meena was forced to stay when she first sought
exile in our country.
For
more in-depth info visit our information page.
Return to top of page
|
|