|
home > legislation > 2004 legislative report
HB 239 "Sexually
Explicit Business and Escort Service Tax"
February
19, 2004
Senate
Revenue & Taxation Committee
Room 131
State Capitol
Dear
Committee Members,
We
write to recommend against passage of House Bill 239, Sexually Explicit
Business and Escort Service Tax, because the bill likely violates the
First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The bill would burden
the protected free speech rights and discriminate against the businesses
by requiring only the specified businesses to pay the tax. This selective
taxation of a specific industry, without a showing that the tax scheme
is necessary to serve a compelling state interest, is impermissible.
See, e.g., Arkansas Writers’ Project, Inc. v. Ragland, 107 S.
Ct. 1722, 481 U.S. 221 (1987). H.B. 239 presents no evidence that there
is a connection between the “sexually explicit” businesses
and the need for treatment programs and task forces dealing with sex.
The connection seems especially tenuous in relation to escort businesses,
creating the impression that the tax aims to discriminate against an
unpopular or disfavored activity.
Further,
H.B. 239 is not narrowly drawn. While the State may have a general interest
in generating revenue to fund specific programs, taxing one industry
based on its content does not justify such a tax. Revenues may be needed
to fund the programs that would benefit from this tax, but this end
could be accomplished by taxing businesses generally. Additionally,
the selective taxation proposed under H.B. 239 may have the effect of
censoring protected speech. See, e.g., Minneapolis Star & Tribune
Co. v. Minnesota Comm’r of Revenue, 103 S. Ct. 1365, 460 U.S.
575 (1983).
This
committee should vote against H.B. 239, and avoid passing a tax that
discriminates based on the content of the speech or that singles out
specific speech for taxation.
Respectfully,
Margaret Plane
Staff Attorney
|
|
|