|
home > about us
The History of the ACLU of Utah
In
1958, Adam "Mickey" Duncan traveled to the national office of
the ACLU in New York and secured the charter for the Utah Affiliate. Prior
to 1958, ACLU members in Utah were led by Spencer W. Kimball, Jr., dean
of the University of Utah Law School.
Late 1950s, Early 1960s:
Without any paid staff, and working on a shoestring budget, the Utah
Affiliate of the ACLU worked to improve jail conditions and to stem the
abuse of police powers. Volunteers working with the Utah ACLU succeeded
in challenging police "sweep" policies in Spanish-speaking neighborhoods
and pushed the Utah Legislature to enact a bill guaranteeing equal access
to public accommodations. Although there was an enormous public outcry
over discrimination by the Hotel Utah against African Americans, the public
accommodations bill died in a Senate committee after being passed by the
House of Representatives.
Late 1960s, Early 1970s:
The Utah affiliate joined national efforts in 1967 to challenge the
punishment of war protesters by draft boards that reclassified students
who participated in antiwar protests. Throughout the late 60s and
early 70s, the ACLU of Utah fought to protect against sexual assaults
on prison inmates, the firing of pregnant school teachers, prayer in public
schools, laws prohibiting the inclusion of minor political parties on
ballots, racial discrimination in private clubs, and ordinances banning
X-rated theaters.
Mid-Late 1970s:
During the mid-70s, the Utah ACLU invested heavily in the First Amendment
through a series of challenges to obscenity statutes and ordinances, including
an appeal of the conviction of a woman charged with selling "obscene"
books, most of which were available at the Provo City Library. The Utah
affiliate also won an important victory in the United States Supreme Court,
which held that states may not refuse unemployment benefits to women 12
weeks before the expected date of childbirth until 6 weeks after childbirth
on the basis of a conclusive presumption that women are unable to work
during that period of time.
Is the statute . . . void in that it denies to her rights
which are given to males? We do not think so. Should a man be unable
to work because he was pregnant, the statute would apply to him equally
as it does to her. What she should do is to work for the repeal of the
biological law of nature. She should get it amended so that men shared
equally with women in bearing children. If she could prevail upon the
Great Creator to so order things, she would be guilty of violating the
equal protection of the law unless she saw to it that man could also
share in the thrill and glory of Motherhood.
It is just as bad to treat unequal things as equals as it is to treat
equal things unequally. In the matter of pregnancy there is no way to
find equality between men and women. The Great Creator so ordained the
difference, and there are few women who would wish to change the situation.
The Utah Supreme Court in Turner v. Department of Employment
Security of Utah
The Fourteenth Amendment requires that unemployment compensation boards
. . . must achieve legitimate state ends through more individualized
means when basic human liberties are at stake. We conclude that the
Utah unemployment compensation statute’s incorporation of a conclusive
presumption of incapacity during so long a period before and after childbirth
is constitutionally invalid . . .
The United States Supreme Court (summarily vacating the judgment
of the Utah Supreme Court) in Turner v. Department of Employment Security
of Utah
In 1976, Utah ACLU hired its first full-time Executive Director, Shirley
Pedler, who led the organization through a pivotal period of growth and
hard-fought battles.
Notwithstanding Gary Gilmore’s death wish, the Utah affiliate worked tirelessly
to prevent his execution in 1977. During the same year, the Utah ACLU
challenged the close connection between LDS seminaries and public schools,
arguing that the granting of public school academic credit for seminary
classes violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. During
the late 1970s, the Utah ACLU also addressed many classic civil rights
problems, such as police abuse (as when the Salt Lake City Police Department
turned its K-9 Corps loose at a Hispanic gathering), prayer in public
schools, and voting rights for students at the Job Corps and the Intermountain
Intertribal Indian School.
1980s:
During the 1980s, the Utah affiliate of the ACLU fought to protect:
Juvenile Rights, including cases against the State Industrial School and
the Provo Canyon Boys School, challenging inhumane conditions of confinement.
Gay and Lesbian Rights, including the defense of a young man entrapped
by a decoy employed by the BYU Security Office and a challenge to the
firing of a gay employee of the University of Utah Medical Center after
he advised his supervisor that he would appear on a televised documentary
about gays in the LDS Church.
Due Process Rights, as in the successful fight against the practice of
strip and body-cavity searching of women booked into the Salt Lake County
Jail on minor violations.
First Amendment Rights, including the successful challenge to the notorious
Cable TV Decency Act, passed by the Utah State Legislature over Governor
Scott Matheson’s veto and ruled unconstitutional by the federal courts.
Inmate Rights, including several lawsuits involving overcrowding of jails
and prisons, the denial of inmate access to the courts, and inadequate
medical care for inmates.
1990s:
The 1990s have brought tremendous growth
to the Utah ACLU, unprecedented numbers of volunteers, and a broad range
of important civil liberties issues that may have gone unresolved without
the work of the Utah affiliate. Michelle Parish, who served as Executive
Director from 1989 until 1993, was succeeded by Carol Gnade, Utah ACLU’s
current Executive Director. Among the battles waged by the Utah ACLU during
the 90s are:
The overturning by the federal courts of the Utah State Legislature’s
1991 anti-abortion statute, the most restrictive anti-choice legislation
in the country.
The successful effort to bring about significant changes in the facilities
and means of caring for mentally ill inmates at the Utah State Prison.
The successful challenge to an illegal secret meeting of many members
of the Utah State Senate, the focus of which was a gay- and lesbian-bashing
discussion and video film.
A lawsuit against the Salt Lake School District in connection with the
prohibition of gay, lesbian and straight support groups.
Increasing public awareness of the brutal treatment of mentally ill inmates
at the Utah State Prison and working with corrections officials to revise
policies and procedures, especially after an inmate died as a result of
being strapped down to a restraint chair for 16 hours.
A suit against Nebo School District on behalf of a teacher who, after
she revealed that she is a lesbian, was fired as volleyball coach and
received a memo from the district instructing her not to discuss her personal
life with students, parents or employees.
The above is only a partial history of the Utah Affiliate of the ACLU.
The daily work of the Utah ACLU includes researching the facts surrounding
complaints of civil rights abuses, mediating the resolution of many disputes,
lobbying against proposed legislative bills that pose threats to the constitutional
rights of Utahns, educating our community about civil rights issues, and
resorting to court action to establish important legal principles for
the protection of individual rights and liberties.
The Utah ACLU does not promote a particular political point of view, except
to the extent that it advocates and seeks to vindicate the constitutional
rights of everyone. The national organization has represented very different
people from the neo-Nazis in Skokie and Oliver North to John Scopes
and the Industrial Workers of the World. Similarly, the Utah ACLU has
pursued a principled approach to civil rights advocacy, never considering
the political leanings or the popularity of those it represents, but focusing
solely on the important constitutional issues at stake. According to the
Utah ACLU, Due Process is for all; Equal Protection is for all; Freedom
of Speech and of Religion is for all. Our members and our volunteers are
proud of the tradition of vigorous advocacy by the Utah ACLU in the name
of freedom and liberty. And they are proud to be "card-carrying members,"
without whom the work of the ACLU and the Utah affiliate would be impossible.
Return to top of the page
|
|
|