|
home > legislation > 2000 legislative report
ACLU of Utah Urges Governor Leavitt to Veto SB
21 "Patriotic Education"
March 7, 2000
The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt
Office of the Governor
Utah State Capitol
Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: S.B. 21 (Patriotic Education)
Dear Governor Leavitt:
The American Civil Liberties Union of Utah urges you to veto S.B. 2 1. While we support the goal of
enhancing all students’ understanding of and respect for this country, its Constitution and its
symbols, we believe provisions of this bill are unconstitutional and counterproductive.
S.B. 21 requires that the pledge of allegiance be recited at the beginning of the day in each
elementary public school in the state and encourages its being recited once a week in the
secondary schools. It further provides that students are to be advised of their right not to partipate
in reciting the pledge. Our primary objection to the enrolled bill, however, is the language in lines
27-28, which provides: "A student shall be excused from reciting the pledge upon written request
from the student’s parent or legal guardian.” We are also concerned that the bill does not account
for a teacher’s right not to participate in the mandatory pledge ceremony. A better approach, which
the legislature could pursue next year, is to limit the statute to the provisions that require
instruction on the matters set forth in 36 U.S.C 170 to 177, which describe the patriotic customs
associated with the playing of the national anthem and the manner of delivery of the pledge, but do
not require any individual to observe the custom
More than 40 years ago, the United States Supreme Court held that the government cannot coerce
students to affirm their loyalty to the United States. Speaking with great eloquence, the Court held
that: "National unity as an end which officials may foster by persuasion and example is not in
question. The problem is whether under our Constitution compulsion ... is a permissible means for
its achievement.” West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. The court recognized an
individual right of conscience for everyone, including students, to sit silently during the pledge of
allegiance. Barnette and its progeny make clear it is not for the parent or guardian to grant
permission to decline to participate, but for each student to decide.
Court precedents and statutes aside, the First Amendment gives all Americans a right to express
their opinion on legitimate public policy matters. That implies also a right not to express opinions
they do not believe, even on matters that go to the core of our democratic principles. As the
Supreme Court has said: "Freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That
would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that
touch the heart of the existing order. If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is
that no official high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion,
or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.” Those
principles are fully in force when someone chooses, as a matter of sacred conscience, not to recite
the pledge because he or she does not believe, for example, that America has achieved its ideal of
ensuring "liberty and justice for all.”
Installing patriotic ideals in our youth is a noble objective. But it is ironic and counterproductive if,
seeking to accomplish that objective, we ignore the fundamental principles in the Constitution. The
ACLU urges you to veto S.B. 21 and to encourage instruction that is more in line with America’s
constitutional values.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Carol Gnade
Executive Director
Stephen Clark
Legal Director
|
|
|