|
home > newsroom
Utah Businesses, National Trade Associations
and Individuals Commence Federal Court Challenge to Unconstitutional
Restrictions on Internet Speech
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 9, 2005
PDF version >>
SALT LAKE CITY--Citing free speech and interstate
commerce violations, a broadly-based group of Utah bookstores, artistic
and informative websites, Internet service providers and national trade
associations filed a federal lawsuit today challenging the constitutionality
of a Utah law meant to restrict children’s access to material
on the Internet.
“This law has nothing to do with the
laudable goal of protecting children,” said Wesley Felix, a shareholder
at the Salt Lake City law firm of Bendinger, Crockett, Peterson, Greenwood
& Casey and co-counsel for the plaintiffs. “Not only does
it not accomplish its stated objective, but it casts such a wide net
that a lot of valuable and perfectly legal speech will be censored.”
Betsy Burton, owner of The King’s English
Bookshop in Salt Lake City and the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, is
worried about the effect the law will have on her business’s website
that features descriptions and jacket art from a wide variety of books
for children and for adults. “Unless I limit the website to children’s
books or attempt to exclude children from our website, I risk the danger
of a criminal charge. Both of these alternatives are incompatible with
the nature of a general community bookstore such as The King’s
English,” she said.
Burton also noted that the law does not outline
any sort of appeals process, and wondered, “If I found out that
my site is considered harmful to minors, how would I challenge this
designation?”
Michael Bamberger of Sonnenschein Nath &
Rosenthal LLP, New York, NY, co-counsel in the case, notes the chilling
effect the law has on the speech of people like Burton. “It is
very likely that some Web publishers may try to avoid problems altogether
by not posting speech they think might be considered in violation of
the law,” said Bamberger. “Courts have repeatedly rejected
laws that lead to this sort of self-censorship.”
The new law, passed by the 2005 session of
the Utah legislature, has three primary components:
1) Utah Internet content providers must evaluate
and rate their speech, at the risk of criminal punishment.
2) The Utah Attorney General must create
a public registry of Internet sites worldwide containing “material
harmful to minors” — speech that is unlawful to intentionally
distribute to minors but that is constitutionally protected for adults.
3) It extends existing criminal restrictions
on distribution of “harmful” materials to distribution
on the Internet. Similar provisions have been uniformly held unconstitutional
under the Commerce Clause and the First Amendment by federal courts
across the nation.
The lawsuit also challenges a provision that
may lead to the blocking of a significant number of innocent websites
simply because they have the same Internet protocol addresses as targeted
sites.
“To comply with the law, Internet Service
Providers are authorized to block access to certain content, and this
would almost unavoidably lead to the blocking, and thus the censorship,
of innocent websites,” said co-counsel John Morris of the Center
for Democracy and Technology. “Also troubling is the fact that
the publishers of these sites may never realize they’re being
blocked.”
Plaintiffs Utah Progressive Network and Andrew
McCullough have websites that are hosted on shared IP addresses with
unrelated sites, some of which contain material likely harmful to minors.
They fear that because of the new law, their sites and their constitutionally-protected
speech will be blocked.
“Unfortunately, legislators chose to
pass a convoluted bill, despite warnings that courts have consistently
struck down laws like this because they violate the First Amendment
and the Commerce Clause,” said ACLU of Utah staff attorney Margaret
Plane.
The name of the case is The King’s English
v. Shurtleff; it challenges Utah Code § 67-5-19, §§ 76-10-1205
through 1206, and §§ 76-10-1230 through 1233. Plaintiffs are
The King’s English, Inc.; Sam Weller’s Zion Bookstore; Nathan
Florence; W. Andrew McCullough; Computer Solutions International, Inc.;
Mountain Wireless Utah, LLC; the Sexual Health Network, Inc., Utah Progressive
Network Education Fund, Inc.; the American Booksellers Foundation for
Free Expression; the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah; the Association
of American Publishers; the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund; the Freedom
to Read Foundation; and the Publishers Marketing Association.
--end--
PDF version of the complaint filed in court >>
Background information from the ACLU of Utah 2005 Legislative Report
>>
|
|
|