home > newsroom Court Declares Utah’s “Commercial Terrorism” Statute Unconstitutional FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, October 10, 2001 SALT LAKE CITY – In a ruling issued from the bench today, U.S. District Judge Bruce Jenkins declared Utah’s “commercial terrorism” statute facially unconstitutional and permanently enjoined the law from taking effect. The ruling resulted from a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah on behalf of the Utah Animal Rights Coalition, whose members feared that under the statute, the lawful demonstrations they regularly conduct in front of Utah businesses would be classified as criminal activity. Passed during the 2001 legislative session, House Bill 322 “Domestic Terrorism of Commercial Enterprises” created a new crime called “commercial terrorism,” which applied to any person or business and included a substantial amount of constitutionally protected expression. Under HB 322, an individual is guilty of commercial terrorism if “he enters … a building of any business with the intent to interfere with the employees, customers, personnel, or operation of a business.” The definition of “enter” included “the intrusion of any physical object, sound wave, light ray, electronic signal or other means of intrusion under the control of the actor.” Janelle Eurick, ACLU of Utah staff attorney, called this definition an absurd notion that has no place in a democratic society. “How can there be free expression that doesn’t involve light rays or sound waves? The statute made it a crime for demonstrators to lawfully assemble on a public sidewalk if their verbal or written messages that are intended to dissuade people from patronizing the business ‘enter’ the premises.” In its brief, the ACLU of Utah argued that the law did not ensure that speakers had a reasonable alternative channel of communication. To the contrary, the restrictions required demonstrators to be out of sight and earshot of a business they intended to protest, thus preventing them from reaching their intended audience. Eurick described the court’s decision as a victory for the First Amendment. “Today’s ruling recognizes that it is a fundamental right of all individuals to freely communicate their ideas and messages concerning the practices of retail establishments from the public sidewalks in front of those businesses. This freedom is the essence of the right to free expression and the court rightly concluded that it should not be considered a crime.” --end--

ACLU OF UTAH UNION OR FOUNDATION? | USER AGREEMENT | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US © 2013 ACLU OF UTAH · 355 NORTH 300 WEST · SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103 · T (801) 521-9862 · F (801) 532-2850