|
home > legislation > 2004 legislative report
Prohibition of Public Funding for Abortion
Governor
Olene Walker
210 State Capitol
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-0601
March 10,
2004
Dear Governor
Walker,
The ACLU
of Utah appreciates the opportunity to comment on Third Substitute SB
68, Prohibition of Public Funding for Abortion.
The pending
law would prohibit the use of public funds for abortion services, except
in limited situations. We are concerned about SB 68 because the pending
law has unclear and possibly widespread fiscal ramifications, and it
inappropriately contradicts federal Medicaid regulations. We hope that
your office recognizes that this law may therefore be impossible to
implement without threatening Utah’s Medicaid funding or the funding
of public health facilities that perform abortions.
While it
is problematic that the fiscal ramifications are both unclear and unknown,
we are primarily concerned with SB 68’s narrow waiver of the requirement
that cases of rape or incest be reported to the police. The bill only
allows waiver of the reporting requirement if the woman was unable to
report for physical reasons or fear of retaliation. In contrast, under
federal regulations concerning the use of public funds for abortion,
the reporting requirement may be waived when a physician certifies that
the patient cannot report for physical or psychological reasons. The
Utah requirement is more restrictive and lacks the objective standard
of a physician to determine whether a woman is unable to report a case
of rape or incest.
By imposing
eligibility requirements that are more restrictive than those permitted
under federal law, SB 68 arguably places Utah’s federal Medicaid
funds at risk. Further, by not participating in the Medicaid program
under the terms established by Congress, the bill violates the Supremacy
Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
We believe
the state has an interest in both following the federal regulatory requirements
to receive Medicaid funding, and in keeping abortion safe and legal
for women of all economic levels. This bill is not about abortion on
demand—it is about the use of public funding in unique and limited
circumstances.
Respectfully,
Dani Eyer
Executive Director
Margaret
Plane
Staff Attorney
|
|
|