Utah v. Valdez (2022)

  • Filed: 03/16/2022
  • Status: Victory!
  • Court: Supreme Court of Utah
  • Latest Update: Mar 16, 2022
Utah v. Valdez
This embed will serve content from {{ domain }}. See our privacy statement

The American Civil Liberties Union of Utah and the national office of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief along with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) in the case of Utah v. Valdez, which was argued in front of the Supreme Court of Utah on March 16, 2022.

For the first time, Utah's highest court will address the question of whether a person’s refusal to unlock an encrypted mobile phone can be used by the State to imply guilt against that person in a criminal trial.

The circumstances of this case are unique because they did not exist twenty years ago, let alone in the 1790s when the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination was added to the U.S. Constitution. That is because this case involves the question of whether a person’s refusal to unlock an encrypted mobile phone can be used by the State to imply guilt against that person in a criminal trial.

Case Number:
20210175

Shiny Surveillance Tech Fails Again

Utah’s short-lived attempt to question all travelers entering the state flopped not because of privacy concerns, but because of too much spam. But we still think it was a bad idea.

shiny tech

Related News & Podcasts

News & Commentary
Apr 15, 2020
shiny tech

Shiny Surveillance Tech Fails Again

Utah’s short-lived attempt to question all travelers entering the state flopped not because of privacy concerns, but because of too much spam. But we still think it was a bad idea.