All Legislation

Legislation
Mar 13, 2026
Placeholder image
  • State Advocacy

HB392 (District Court Amendments)

The original version of HB392 would have created an entirely new court, called the “Constitutional Court,” to hear cases challenging the constitutionality of state laws. The judges on the court were to be chosen by a commission selected by the Governor and then approved by the Legislature.  
Status: Introduced
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Mar 13, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Disability Rights|
  • +2 Issues

HB495 (Capital Felony Case Amendments)

HB495 modifies competency proceedings in capital felony cases, removing important protections for individuals with intellectual disabilities by: requiring initial IQ tests and penalizing defendants who object to them, changing the criteria and process for automatic review of death sentences, creating expedited review timelines, and creating barriers for appeal and ineffective assistance of counsel challenges.    
Status: Passed: Sent to Governor
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Mar 13, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Participatory Democracy & Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

HB479 (Election Code Modifications)

HB479 was another attempt to gradually end Utah’s overwhelmingly popular vote-by-mail system. It revived many of the unpopular elements stripped out of HB300, the bill amending voting laws passed in 2025. HB479 would have required a voter to opt in every 8 years to return their ballot by mail, otherwise requiring them to return their mail ballot in person with a valid ID to either a polling location or a drop box staffed by two poll workers. This would have essentially required in-person voting for many Utahns.
Status: Victory: did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Mar 13, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights|
  • +1 Issue

HB571 (Immigrant Amendments )

HB571 was a sweeping anti-immigrant bill. It would have imposed broad restrictions on non-citizens, limiting their ability to bank, work, and live freely in Utah. The bill would have prohibited banks from opening accounts or issuing loans to anyone using a foreign ID.  
Status: Victory: did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Mar 13, 2026
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment|
  • +2 Issues

HB517 (Sensitive Materials)

HB517 would have made it harder for guardians, students, educators, and authors to sue to protect their First Amendment rights, as it attempted to extend government immunity to state and local officials (including school districts), prohibit class actions, and allow school districts to require guardians to sign arbitration agreements.  
Status: Victory: did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Mar 13, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Disability Rights|
  • +1 Issue

SRJ7 (Joint Resolution Regarding Utah’s Protection & Advocacy Agency)

SJR7 would have called on the Governor to reconsider the Disability Law Center’s status as the state’s Protection & Advocacy Agency. This designation provides the organization with federal funding to serve people with disabilities in Utah. The timing of this bill was particularly concerning, given that the Disability Law Center had just filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of SB199. This 2025 law created a new ultra-guardianship for severely disabled individuals.  
Status: Victory: did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Mar 13, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Abortion Care|
  • +1 Issue

HB315 (Human Development Instruction)

HB315 would have required public schools to show students an ultrasound video and a video depicting fetal development twice between grades 7-12 in a health education class. The specific goal of this bill was to require schools to show “Baby Olivia”, a medically misleading video produced by an extreme anti-abortion group called Live Action.  
Status: Victory: did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Mar 11, 2026
Placeholder image
  • State Advocacy

HB366 (Judicial Modifications)

HB366 is deeply intertwined with HB392. HB366 makes several changes to the transfer process in HB392 and adds a fallback option in case the Utah Supreme Court rules the transfer to a three-judge panel unconstitutional.
Status: Passed: Sent to Governor
Position: Oppose